Red Flags to Watch For When Hiring an Offshore Development Team
본문
An estimate that arrives instantly counts as a red flag rather than good service. A competent team returns questions first: about users and volumes. A supplier that commits to a figure with no clarification is guessing, and a guess becomes a change request later — at your expense.
Watch for a mismatch between the team in the pitch and the developers actually assigned. Ask for named engineers in the statement of work, with a provision that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A team that only offers a pool of resources and will not commit to specific engineers is reserving the right to assign anyone it likes.
Insist on access to the repository from the start. A team that delivers code only at milestones expects you to take delivery on faith. Visible commits show you the actual pace far better than a weekly report. This extends to the CI pipeline: graphql vs rest if there is no pipeline, quality claims remain nothing more than words.
Vague contract language around code ownership is rarely a formality. The document should state explicitly that all outputs produced under it transfer to the client as they are paid for. Also check the governing law and how payments are structured: heavy prepayment with no deliverable attached takes away your only leverage.
Last, pay attention to how they communicate. Ask how much working-time overlap you will share with your timezone, who answers questions and on what is livewire in laravel response times. Some genuine overlap is normally sufficient; none at all stretches a five-minute question into a twenty-four hour round trip. Careless writing in the early emails rarely improves later.
댓글목록0
댓글 포인트 안내